Calling Prague Round 14 Pairings

Booster Draft

Table
Player 1
vs.
Player 2
Table 121
Oliver Spapens
vs.
Sean Knowelden
Table 122
Griffin Meyers
vs.
Thomas Van Minsel
Table 123
Andrei Sebastian Suciu
vs.
Rok Havlas
Table 124
Peter Nethan Henriksen
vs.
Jacob Clements
Table 125
Paul van Gijssel
vs.
Sebastian Grøndal
Table 126
Lorenzo Brambilla Pisoni
vs.
Piotr Chudobinski
Table 127
Tommaso Viscido
vs.
Jason Rolfe
Table 128
Darvydas Čepukaitis
vs.
Jose Ricardo Ordoñez Muller
Table 129
Richard Carr
vs.
Pablo Pintor
Table 130
Maurice Hostettler
vs.
Adam Urban
Table 131
Marc Lanigra
vs.
André Kofmel
Table 132
Yassine Echafai Tripiana
vs.
Thorbjørn Lind Jensen
Table 133
Felix Krisch
vs.
Simon Nielsen
Table 134
Callum Young
vs.
Finlay Freir
Table 135
Anton Cid Mejias
vs.
Dawid Mrówczyński
Table 136
Eugenio Papavero Crusca
vs.
Artur Wysocki
Table 137
Ville Teräväinen
vs.
Giulio Monaco
Table 138
Emilis Dirmeikis
vs.
Andrew Rayner
Table 139
Adam Tuček
vs.
Ian Holland
Table 140
Gints Dreimanis
vs.
Tomasz Żelazko
Table 141
Tobias Hartfiel
vs.
Franciszek Sapikowski
Table 142
Bastien LAVIGNON
vs.
Finlay Shepherd
Table 143
Emanuele Tozzi
vs.
Ruben Van Dessel
Table 144
Mikey Dwyer
vs.
Declan Patrick
Table 145
Daniyar Saduakassov
vs.
Luke Gilmore
Table 146
Florin-Cristian Loghin
vs.
Ugnius Švedas
Table 147
Yuki Lee Bender
vs.
Mirko Dolce
Table 148
Emlyn Ingram
vs.
Benedikt Scharf
Table 149
Teo Matuška
vs.
Warre Sevens
Table 150
Elaine Cao
vs.
Mateusz Pachciarz
Table 151
Jyry Soinio
vs.
Gabe Sher
Table 152
Kai "Käpt'n" Schmidt
vs.
Piotr Stelmach
Table 153
Tomasz Zalejski
vs.
Rain Ööpik
Table 154
Gianluigi Lia
vs.
Michael Neugebauer
Table 155
Sebastian Kleiner
vs.
None
Table 156
Louis Guillot
vs.
None
Table 157
Michał Zalejski
vs.
None

Please be advised that the live pairings, results and standings published here are for coverage purposes and utilize new software integrations which are still under development. The results and standings within our GEM tournament software are to be considered the final and correct results in the event there is any discrepancy with those provided for coverage purposes.